<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White waterlily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.minnak.net/quietpicture/2009/07/23/white-waterlily/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.minnak.net/quietpicture/2009/07/23/white-waterlily/</link>
	<description>Finding my voice in the silence of nature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:49:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miika</title>
		<link>http://www.minnak.net/quietpicture/2009/07/23/white-waterlily/comment-page-1/#comment-32067</link>
		<dc:creator>Miika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnak.net/quietpicture/?p=1699#comment-32067</guid>
		<description>I see your point. And especially on this pic, waves would not help on the reflection...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point. And especially on this pic, waves would not help on the reflection&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minna</title>
		<link>http://www.minnak.net/quietpicture/2009/07/23/white-waterlily/comment-page-1/#comment-32055</link>
		<dc:creator>Minna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnak.net/quietpicture/?p=1699#comment-32055</guid>
		<description>No you wouldn&#039;t prefer it without a pol filter, trust me. The water and the pads look just downright horrible, no colour at all. The only way it would work without a pol is if you were able to fill the frame with the flower and its reflection so the colour is no issue.

Don&#039;t believe me? Take your camera out to a waterlily pond and shoot with and without a pol... see which version pops. ;) Oh and it also depends on the angle. The lower you get, the less effect the filter will have. I threw away all my low angle shots!

Hmm... but now I remember that you were actually quite creative without a polariser. So I guess it depends, but I still don&#039;t think that a non-polarised white waterlily looks any good. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No you wouldn&#8217;t prefer it without a pol filter, trust me. The water and the pads look just downright horrible, no colour at all. The only way it would work without a pol is if you were able to fill the frame with the flower and its reflection so the colour is no issue.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me? Take your camera out to a waterlily pond and shoot with and without a pol&#8230; see which version pops. <img src='http://www.minnak.net/quietpicture/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Oh and it also depends on the angle. The lower you get, the less effect the filter will have. I threw away all my low angle shots!</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; but now I remember that you were actually quite creative without a polariser. So I guess it depends, but I still don&#8217;t think that a non-polarised white waterlily looks any good. <img src='http://www.minnak.net/quietpicture/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miika</title>
		<link>http://www.minnak.net/quietpicture/2009/07/23/white-waterlily/comment-page-1/#comment-32052</link>
		<dc:creator>Miika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minnak.net/quietpicture/?p=1699#comment-32052</guid>
		<description>Is only me then, but I think I prefer the one without polarising filter? Instead of reflection, there is a shadow, that is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is only me then, but I think I prefer the one without polarising filter? Instead of reflection, there is a shadow, that is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

